Jump to content
Mander Organs

John Robinson

Members
  • Content Count

    901
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by John Robinson

  1. Yes. I have it as one of my 'tabs' and have a look every day. Unfortunately, every time I look no-one has posted! Of course, with our help that could change! On the other hand, this forum is still going, thankfully, and may yet continue.
  2. I'd like to thank Darius for an excellent recital yesterday. I listened to it yesterday evening, on 'catch-up' (I think it's called), but haven't before today been able to write my congratulations on a fantastic display not only of interesting pieces skilfully played, but also the magnificent town hall organ. It has been several years since I have had the opportunity to attend the lunchtime recitals, but hopefully these may begin again when these 'lock downs' are over. If anyone here is interested, I believe it is still available on the web site Darius provided above.
  3. I agree. 'Marge' and some of her choir members have experimented with a candle. Er... please bear with me. 😉 A lit candle is held in front of the mouth. With normal speech, the flame is extinguished. Singing, however, does not extinguish the flame. I think that must prove something.
  4. Yes, the same problem was mentioned quite a while ago with regard to York: the organ being loud enough to fill the nave would be overwhelming in the choir. I think it was probably Francis Jackson. I don't doubt the great man's words, but organs need not always 'roar', surely? I have often thought, and of course I stress that I am no organist or expert, that it must be possible to select appropriate stops to handle a nave full of people, yet to choose fewer stops to accompany a smaller number of people in the choir. Of course, if both choir and nave are used concurrently, the problem may be more difficult, but how often is this actually the case? I understood that (at York anyway) services and recitals are usually held in the choir OR the nave. Am I mistaken?
  5. Terrible news. Let's hope that somebody, somewhere can come up with the goods. Covid cannot last for ever, and when the problem is past we shall, once again need organs building and maintaining.
  6. Thank you. Bookmarked! An interesting programme. Any further news about the proposed rebuild of the LTH organ? Any definite specification?
  7. I remember many years ago a certain dean from a certain cathedral in Bradford making a mistake that I presume he must have seriously regretted afterwards. You'd think a person in that position would have the sense to think before acting.
  8. Exactly the same thing that happened at York Minster in 1829, with the exception that the organ which was destroyed in that case was by Blythe (1803) and ?bits of Bernard Smith (1691), and the case by Dallam. The original choir stalls went as well.
  9. Yes. Nonsense. I mentioned elsewhere on this forum that I have been watching weekly organ recitals from Cologne Cathedral on YouTube. I think it has now been five, and each is by a different organist. There has been quite a wide range of composers and few, if any, of the more hackneyed pieces. I am fortunate to be able to watch this on our large TV set with a good sound system, using a Firestick. Incidentally, the cathedral appears to be well populated for these recitals, though sensible 'distancing' is applied. If Cologne can do it, why can't Wales? Silly over-reaction, I suppose.
  10. I have never heard anything so ridiculous.
  11. Just an aside, but I was at that event when a nice lady asked me where the speakers are!
  12. Not wishing to be intentionally disagreeing, but I love the Reubke sonata. One of my favourite pieces. As I understand it, he died before his time and had he lived for longer I'm sure he would have produced many more brilliant pieces. As for Widor, he wrote an excellent mass. Again, one of my favourites. Still, as they say, there's no accounting for taste!
  13. I find it sad that organs don't seem to deserve much public following in this country. Certainly not to compare with Germany and the Netherlands, or even France. Who can we blame? Well, the public, I suppose?
  14. I agree about the Cologne Cathedral organ, with which I have had a long-term interest, and it does produce an excellent sound. On that matter, there is a broadcast on Facebook tomorrow and weekly thereafter at 1845. Excellent close-ups of the player in action, of course! https://www.domradio.de/web-tv/orgelfeierstunde-drittes-konzert I watch these on Facebook using Amazon Firestick on our TV with good quality sound, though it should be possible to do it on a computer. Incidentally, it states 2000, but that is 1900 our time of course! EDIT: My apologies. I have just 'tuned in' to watch this evening's recital and find that it actually starts bang on 1900 (our time).
  15. Indeed. I'm pleased to hear that many found the presence, even the existence! of an organist fascinating. That is one of the reasons I mentioned it. I shouldn't be surprised to hear that some are not even aware of an organist, believing that the organ is a machine which plays itself, just like their HiFi at home! I always found the story of the famous organist W. T. Best amusing when, awaiting his prompt to play a town hall organ, the mayor announced to the audience that "The organ will now play", remained in his seat and when a questioning look from the mayor was forthcoming said, "Damn the organ, let it play!" I personally believe that the organist should be visible to the congregation (assuming s/he is willing!), just as everyone else on the 'stage' is. It might even result in the general public in this country taking more interest in the organ especially as, if the organ had as much public following here as in, say, Germany and the Netherlands, we might find that fewer organs in churches are being scrapped!
  16. A couple of interesting things occur to me here, not knowing anything about the Hexham instrument. Perhaps someone can help. Is it possible that the 'back' (the chancel side) of the organ is mainly covered up for a very good reason? That the organ, being so close to the choir stalls, might be too powerful here unless attenuated by the use of these boards, yet unobstructed at the nave side where a more powerful sound is needed. (Or perhaps the chancel and choir stalls are never actually used.) My other question, completely unrelated to this particular organ though brought to mind by the picture, concerns the common practice of providing a curtain to 'hide' the organist from view. Is this done for the organist's benefit, if s/he is a 'reserved' sort of person, or to avoid the congregation being aware of his/her presence as a distraction from the religious side of things? Hopefully, the curtain can be slid to one side if a recital is taking place!
  17. Very sad news, not only for the organ world as a whole, but also... I used to fancy her.😍
  18. Haha! I'll suggest that to 'Marge'! Fortunately, she has very good hearing so I don't find I have to repeat myself at all. On the other hand, she does... quite a lot. In fairness to her, though, she doesn't often become too angry with me!
  19. Yes indeed. That makes a lot of sense.
  20. An interesting point. Actually, I find that my hearing aids help generally in attempting to correct my loss of high frequency perception and in many situations I am quite happy with things. However, when listening to Priory DVD demonstrations of various organs and specific stops, especially 2' and higher, above a certain point on the keyboard the sound completely disappears. I am sure that is due not to an inferior sound system, which mine is not, but due entirely to my ears. I'm sure a point must arise where, however good the hearing aids, a sound cannot be amplified when the ear is completely unable to perceive that frequency level. Conversely, when watching the television news, using the same sound system, I am quite repelled by the sharpness and power of some ladies' voices, especially American ones for some reason. However, I too find a distinct benefit to my hearing loss. As my father before me often did, I can justifiably claim that I hadn't heard something which I actually heard but didn't want to hear!
  21. It is indeed an impressive organ, though I'm surprised that it doesn't have a single 32' stop.
  22. Absolutely no apologies needed! I found your explanations both interesting and enlightening and I agree with them entirely. I might add that I respect and enjoy the benefit of your far greater knowledge of the subject. I have heard for myself that organs with relatively low wind pressure can be at least as 'loud' as the high-pressure ones which held sway in this country in the early 20th century. There are far more important factors in play: location within the building, the building itself, the use of strong mixtures, etc, etc. My personal preference has always been for a brighter sound, especially since my hearing has begun to deteriorate!
  23. Still pristine and unadulterated white despite my present location, I assure you! Yes, of course, I'm sure that stone roofs carry the sound of an organ better than wooden roofs which, I'm sure, must absorb much of the higher harmonics.
×
×
  • Create New...