Guest Psalm 78 v.67 Posted March 20, 2007 Share Posted March 20, 2007 Well, I agree, in principle. However, I am still faintly surprised* when I peruse a proposed specification which reads something like this: PEDAL ORGAN Open Diapason 16 Bourdon 16 Principal 8 Flute 8 Super Octave 4 Trombone 16 Trumpet 8 Great to Pedal Swell to Pedal GREAT ORGAN Bourdon 16 Open Diapason 8 Stopped Diapason 8 Principal 4 Nason Flute 4 Nazard 2 2/3 Fifteenth 2 Tierce 1 3/5 Furniture (19-22-26-29) IV Trumpet 8 Cremona 8 Swell to Great SWELL ORGAN Open Diapason 8 Rohr Flute 8 Viola da Gamba 8 Voix Célestes (TC) 8 Gemshorn 4 Open Flute 4 Flageolet 2 Mixture (15-19-22-26) IV Bassoon 16 Hautboy 8 Cornopean 8 Tremulant Mechanical action. My surprise stems, not simply from the un-imaginative predictability, rather from the subsequent copy, which invariably reads: "Consultant: (insert favourite name) ". I fail to understand why someone would pay a third party for designing the above 'instrument' - it took me no longer than the time needed to type the text into this box. I realise that an 'Aubertin' organ (or similar) is not suitable for every church - but surely we can introduce a little more individuality than this? * Perhaps 'bemused' is a more apposite word. But what if this was "right" for the liturgy / repertoire requirements of a church? I have a wide repertoire, and enjoy accompanying the liturgy and would be very happy with this spec... Might even go so far as to dirch the Tierce in favour of a Gamba.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pcnd5584 Posted March 20, 2007 Share Posted March 20, 2007 But what if this was "right" for the liturgy / repertoire requirements of a church? I have a wide repertoire, and enjoy accompanying the liturgy and would be very happy with this spec... Might even go so far as to dirch the Tierce in favour of a Gamba.. A valid point. I also agree about the Tierce - although I would probably just ditch it . I have a Gamba on my own GO and use it in every service. However, I still would not wish to pay a third party for drawing-up such a scheme. I am not convinced that appointing a consultant to oversee a rebuild or a restoration is always either necessary or beneficial. A case in point is the re-commissioning of the organ at Christchurch Priory which took place about eight years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now