Jump to content
Mander Organs
Vox Humana

Vierne's Arabesque From 24 Pièces

Recommended Posts

In bar 8 the second C has no accidental, but, surely, shouldn't it should be C# to match the notes just played an octave lower (not to mention two bars with this figure on the final page)? Ben van Oosten plays C natural here and to my ears it always grates - but that may be just because I'm so used to playing C#. Does the Carus edition shed any light?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In bar 8 the second C has no accidental, but, surely, shouldn't it should be C# to match the notes just played an octave lower (not to mention two bars with this figure on the final page)? Ben van Oosten plays C natural here and to my ears it always grates - but that may be just because I'm so used to playing C#. Does the Carus edition shed any light?

 

The Carus edition puts a cautionary accidental in, so C# is deemed to be correct. The Critical Report says that 'Cautionary accidentals were tacitly supplemented'.

 

H

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Funnily enough, I, too had been thinking about this recently. In my edition, the second (octave higher) D has a sharp, and so I had (perhaps foolishly) assumed that the absence of one before the second C meant that it was implicitly natural. If both the C and D were to be sharpened, I assumed that their treatment in the score would have been consistent. However, if the C was natural, one might have expected a natural sign just to make that clear. In other words, I don't really know. I like the sound of the C natural, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Carus edition puts a cautionary accidental in, so C# is deemed to be correct. The Critical Report says that 'Cautionary accidentals were tacitly supplemented'.
Compare with bar 36: must be a C#.

Thank you, both. So Carus's use of a cautionary accidental here would imply, presumably, that not only the print, but also Vierne's manuscript does not mark this C with a sharp. I do think it has to be sharp, though, given all the parallel passages; a C natural has no logic.

 

The other correction in Carus is bar 4 - rhythm should be the same as bar 31.

Thanks. Yes, I think this one must have been published before somewhere since I already have a note of it in my score. Can't remember where I read it, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The other correction in Carus is bar 4 - rhythm should be the same as bar 31.

 

Paul Walton

I had read this somewhere and have altered my copy. As printed the note values don't equal the dotted minim below. Regarding the C#, I have pencilled a sharp in my copy but on reflection I like the natural as it gives the oriental flavour which appears elsewhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...