Jim Treloar Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 This is the title of a new book by John R. Near, published by the University of Rochester (U.S.). A hefty volume, nearly 600 pages including a 50 page list of his works (did you know he wrote that much?) and correspondingly expensive, but looks to me the last word on his life and work. I'm part way through it. Enter the title in Amazon if interested, I was promised delivery in 1 to 2 months but it arrived within 5 days of my order so obviously have it stock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolsey Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 This is the title of a new book by John R. Near, published by the University of Rochester (U.S.). A hefty volume, nearly 600 pages including a 50 page list of his works (did you know he wrote that much?) and correspondingly expensive, but looks to me the last word on his life and work. I'm part way through it. Enter the title in Amazon if interested, I was promised delivery in 1 to 2 months but it arrived within 5 days of my order so obviously have it stock. It would seem to be a more substantial undertaking than Andrew Thomson's useful 116-page biography (OUP 1987). And yes, he was very prolific in music outside the organloft (including operas) - on which point, Stanford's 2nd Piano Concerto in C minor seems worth investigating, on the strength of last Saturday's CD Review on BBC Radio 3. Its debt to Rachmaninov's C minor concerto is unmistakeable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrbouffant Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 Stanford's 2nd Piano Concerto in C minor seems worth investigating, on the strength of last Saturday's CD Review on BBC Radio 3. Its debt to Rachmaninov's C minor concerto is unmistakeable. This is a piece which I have known since about 1990, when it appeared on Chandos played by Margaret Fingerhut. The Concert Variations included on the same disc are also worth exploring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyorgan Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 Totally agree on the Stanford, great piece. Doesn't it predate the Rachmaninov though? I have a disc with some Widor chamber music on it, I think a Piano Trio, very fine piece, and holds its own well with contemporary French chamber music. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malcolm Kemp Posted April 26, 2011 Share Posted April 26, 2011 Widor wrote quite a lot of superb choral/church music, nearly all of which is readily available from publishers in Sussex and Australia. The well-known Mass is but one of those items. Malcolm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrbouffant Posted April 26, 2011 Share Posted April 26, 2011 Totally agree on the Stanford, great piece. Doesn't it predate the Rachmaninov though? No, it dates from 1911. The Rach is from 1900/1. I see from the Proms Archive (http://bbc.co.uk/proms/archive) that there was a performance of it in 2008 -- not sure how I missed that one, normally I would be at a concert like that in a flash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_L Posted April 26, 2011 Share Posted April 26, 2011 I began my life as a 'cellist only wandering to the organ when I got fed up of listening to bad playing on a Sunday!! Widor wrote a wealth of music other than organ music including a number of works for 'cello. The Concerto, which dates from 1882, is the largest of these works and is particularly fine. There is also a Sonata, some earlier pieces for 'cello and piano and a Suite, written in 1912. Harold Truscott lent me the score of the Concerto and I still have a copy of it. I learnt it in my twenties but have never performed it in public. However I have played both the Sonata and the Suite publically. His 'cello parts tend to be quite virtuosic - high in the register, whilst the piano parts are often thick and difficult. I, too, have recordings of the Bb Piano Trio and the D min. Quintet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malcolm Kemp Posted April 26, 2011 Share Posted April 26, 2011 If you want copies of "non-organ" music by Widor contact either Richard Barnes of Cathedral Music (near Chichester) or look on the website of Crescendo Music Publications (who send music from Australia very quickly). Malcolm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyorgan Posted April 26, 2011 Share Posted April 26, 2011 No, it dates from 1911. The Rach is from 1900/1.I see from the Proms Archive (http://bbc.co.uk/proms/archive) that there was a performance of it in 2008 -- not sure how I missed that one, normally I would be at a concert like that in a flash. Apologies, I stand corrected! I wonder if there is any evidence that Stanford heard the Rachmaninov? I suppose there is every chance he will have done. Does anyone have the Dibble/Stanford book? Does it mention it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DouglasCorr Posted May 29, 2011 Share Posted May 29, 2011 I've got my copy now. How blissful it is to wallow in accounts of the giants of an age. For example how Cavaille Coll, with Widor's help, demonstrated a new organ to Listz, and how they were subsequently invited by Listz to Erhard's salon to listen to him play the piano.... How Tournemire and Vierne thought lessons with Widor were going to be more demanding than with Franck... What Widor said to Dupre... The St Sulpice organ.... It's Paradise for me! Perhaps Prince Charles could be introduced to French Romantic organ music and Cavaille Coll organs, then we could have an hour and a half follow on to his entertaining BBC4 programme on Parry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now