Jump to content
Mander Organ Builders Forum

Rodrigo de Sá

Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Rodrigo de Sá

  1. "Would it not have been interesting if one were to make the specifications to a rather small chappel? Say 12*6*8m? In which case one would be able to write down all the mixtures, specify scales (more or less precisely), voicing and the tone one would want to obtain?"

    (Quote)

    Dear Rodrigo,

     

    You may open a new thread with it then.

    Pierre

     

    Dear Pierre:

     

    Too soon, I am quite new here and want to see what seems to interest most members. Moreover I do not want to give the impression I am only interested in hypothetical organs. But thanks for the suggestion.

  2. Simply that 8, 4, 2 works perfectly satisfactorily and a Twelfth serves to obscure counterpoint and is not necessary where adequate mixturework is present (which it always should be, except organs of extremely modest proportions). [...]

     

    Curious, I feel quite the contrary. A quint 3 is usefull in counterpoint, especially if you draw the Quintadena 16 also. It strengthens the 8' tone and I actually find it usefull in counterpoint. That said, I do not like it all that much. Obversely, I very much like the sound of the II Rauschpfeiffe. The octave is stronger than the twelfth (at least that is how I like it). I do not like a 8 4 2 principal chorus in the Great Organ, but rather like a 8 4 3 2 or alternatively, 8 4 II. The penultimate variation of Von Himmel Hoch (Bach) sounds marvelously well with this registration on the right hand (in a good, clear organ).

     

    That said, I have listened and played organs that are great in the strangest combinations. So there may be horrible twelves and quite good ones.

     

    Small note: Would it not have been interesting if one were to make the specifications to a rather small chappel? Say 12*6*8m? In which case one would be able to write down all the mixtures, specify scales (more or less precisely), voicing and the tone one would want to obtain?

  3. I am new here, but there really is no better presentation than designing the specifications of an organ. This one is strongly continental European in concept and it is what I would like in an organ for myself. I am assuming a medium-large sized european church, rather reverberant and I understand the organ is opposite to the altar, and the pipes some ten meters above ground. Tracker action; shove coupling II+I and I, II, III+P. Compass to g and to d (of f) in pedals; straight pedalboard. Electrical combinations. No swell. This is a baroque oriented organ.

     

    I did not count the stops

     

    So:

     

    Great: (I)

     

    Principal 16

    Quintadena 16

    Octave

    Gemshorn 8

    Octava II 4

    Rauschpfeiffe II -2, 1 1/3, repeats at central c

    InfraCymbel 3 2 1 1/3 repeats three times; at medium c it will be 6 4 3

    Cymbel IV-VI 1, 2/3, 1/2, 1/3, treble 4 3 2 2 1.5 1.5

    Terz doppelt 2/3, 2/5 Repeats back to 1-3/5 1-1/3

    Fundamental trompett 16

    Trompett 8

    II coupling

     

    Oberwerk (II)

     

    Principal 8 (narrow)

    Spitzflöte 8 (narrow)

    Octave 4

    Spizflöte 4

    Spitzquinte 3

    Superoctava 2

    Spillflöte 2

    Quinta 1-1/3 (principal group)

    Sexquialter 1-1/3, 4/5 (repeats to normal range at middle c)

    Sharff VI 1, 2/3, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/6 (complex repeating)

    Krumphorn 16

    Vox humana 8

    Oboe 8

    Singend regal 8

    Tremulant

     

    Brustwerk (III)

     

    Closed Wood 8 (rather chiffy)

    Open wood 4

    Principal 2

    Nachthorn 2

    Larigot 1-1/3

    Accuta 1 (sort of a Schwiegel)

    Cymbel III (2/3)

    Regal 8

    Tremulant

     

    Pedal

     

    Prinzipal 16

    Gedackt 16

    Quinta gedeckt 12

    Octava 8

    Open flute 8

    Flute 4+2

    Pleinsche 6, 4, 3, 2, 1-1/3, 1 (no repeats)

    Posaune 32

    Trombone 16

    Dulzian 16

    Trompete 8

    I

    II

    III

     

    All voicing on the quick side, chiffs audible throughout, scales on the narrow side of normal (except in pedal); the wind pressure won't withstand a tutti and the wind is slighlty unsteady (not too much): one must use registration carefully; pedals on separate windchest, stronger wind.

     

    Concerning the use of a 16' on the manuals. This is a very large organ, with a 'rauschende' Hauptwerk with a lot of fifths, a subtle and airy bovenwerk (but very penetrating with a plenum registration) and a delicate 'wooden' brustwerk, with a nice rasping regal; a very deep pedal.

     

    In this case, the 16' range in the manuals must be the unison pitch; therefore, there are mixtures that reinforce the 16' range. Both principal and trumpet 16 must be strong, and the trumpet must sound dark, tenebrous and steady (and rather strong).

     

    In a smller organ I would definitely go for the quintadena alone concerning the 16' manuals: it allows you to play polyphony clearly. If the organ is not designed for polyphony, a bourdon would be better, but unless it is rather strong and the principal 8 rather large, you will just hear a hum under the plenum.

     

    I did not include a Positiv because it never blends well with the HP when coupled: when you listen, the positiv reaches you first and only later the Great Organ; which means you cannot very well get a 16' tone because your ears get the 8' plenum before (the musical line will sound as a muddle - or as if the 16' drags painfully behind the positiv).

     

    Finally: why just a gemshorn 8 as a flue in the HW? Because Gemshorns can, at the same time, accompany a solo (I mean, not as with a bordun, with which you listen to a vague glu-glu instead of a musical line) and also adds to the foundation of the plenum (being a tad principal-like).

     

     

    There are many, many different kinds of organs. I chose this particular one as it seems to allow for a big part of the repertoire that interests me. However, for Buxtehude, a very sharp positiv is, perhaps, preferable to the oberwerk. The positiv could have a somewhat less bright composition than the oberwerk I presented.

     

    Hope this is a sufficient presentation of myself.

×
×
  • Create New...