Jump to content
Mander Organ Builders Forum

geigen

Members
  • Content Count

    20
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by geigen

  1. I am glad A&M is still in use, but you are correct - not in MY universe. The dreaded Hymns Old and New seems to be everywhere; I cannot publicly share my views on it.

     

    They are the 1984 version, 4th impression

     

    To clarify, I obtained these hymnbooks from a church which was throwing them out. I was, at the time, taking a choir on a cathedral visit and we had not got hymn books; I didn't want to photocopy at that time (and would still avoid it)

     

    I need the space in my loft and these have been there for 9 years. I would rather give them away to a good home than take them to the tip which is why I put the question on here. If anybody can think how else I might dispose of them, please advise. I could try Amazon I guess. I doubt Freegle will yield many takers. I also post on the ABRSM forum - any others I might try. The cathedral near me used to use them when I was a chorister 40 years ago but I think they have moved on and even dumped their English Hymnals now - New EH rules OK!

     

    I have not planned my summer holiday yet [if I even have one], so if you live somewhere I'd like to visit I'm happy to deliver them.

     

    Sorry to have stirred up a hornets' nest.

  2. I've used Finale since 1997 and I'm now on 2004. However I am considering swapping to Sibelius were it not for the cost!

     

    If you want a simple piece of software download a demo version of Noteworthy composer. There is some control over formatting but not as much as in the big boys (although I have not played with version 2 very much yet).

     

    As for PDFs, the big 2 ought to export to pdf. For other software you can download free utilities which 'print' to a pdf and I do this all the time even from Word and Excel (2003). I use pdf995 but there are others.

  3. I see the author notes that Vann "played the cathedral organ only infrequently and had a poor opinion of its quality".

    I have never heard the Peterborough organ in the flesh, and whilst the case is admired this is the first time I have seen a criticism about the organ generally. Is Vann out of step here or did he prefer the more muddier sounds that were fashionable pre 1954?

    PJW

     

    I have never heard him say that even when I was a chorister. He used to bemoan the fact that it was sharp (compared to concert pitch) and so he obtained a 'chamber organ' for use with orchestras (this has long since been replaced). A past Precentor used to love to hear Stanley play and accompany the psalms. He used to find effects on the organ other people did not, especially when improvising.

     

    Before the 1980/1 rebuild the few pistons could not adjusted (save for ONE on each department) although the tuner could do so. If Stanley played for a service (and I was with him once or twice when he did) he would go through the pistons to check what as on them as he was unfamiliar with them once they had been made more 'spiky' by my organ teacher soon after his arrival as assistant.

     

    Granted the old cathedral organ had some weird stops (a 32' on the Great for example) and the old Choir dept. was of limited use but I am surprised that he reported as having had a low opinion of it. Perhaps this has come from whoever the journalist spoke to. Of course in the decade or 2 leading up to the 1st rebuild it was held together with string and chewing gum - one got the impression.

  4. Opening Voluntary: Bridge Adagio in E

    Introit: O Bone Jesu - Ratcliffe (have not heard it for 35 years and I think that's the title/composer)

    Responses: Stanley Vann Set 1

    Office Hymn: The royal banners forward go (Gonfalon Royal)

    Psalm: 78 (15th Evening)

    Canticles: Stanford in A

    Anthem: Thee will I love - Howells

    Two Further Hymns: Christ Triumphant (Guiting Power) + Lead Kindly Light (Alberta)

    Concluding Voluntary: Toccata in D flat Jongen

×
×
  • Create New...