JERRY Posted July 28, 2005 Share Posted July 28, 2005 Dear John, I read in an organ building manual by Bonavia Hunt that in some buildings steel wire tuning springs are liable to jam, and that phosphor bronze is used instead by some builders. Which do you use? What are the advantages and disadvantages of the two, and is there any difference in the tone produced? Jerry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Geoff McMahon Posted July 29, 2005 Share Posted July 29, 2005 Steel tuning wires or springs tend to go rusty in any building which is damp, which is why they then stick in the lead block. Nowadays, I think all organ builders use phosphor bronze wires which don't corrode. There is no influence on the tone at all. However, if one comes across such steel reed springs in an organ which is being restored and if they can be retained, they should be. John Pike Mander Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MusingMuso Posted July 29, 2005 Share Posted July 29, 2005 Steel tuning wires or springs tend to go rusty in any building which is damp, which is why they then stick in the lead block. Nowadays, I think all organ builders use phosphor bronze wires which don't corrode. There is no influence on the tone at all. However, if one comes across such steel reed springs in an organ which is being restored and if they can be retained, they should be. John Pike Mander <{POST_SNAPBACK}> =================== I wonder if John could tell us roughly how long steel tuning-springs have been used. Phosphor-Bronze is the obvious choice, because it is naturally springy, and was often used as cheap but effective contact material on electronic organs....probably still is. MM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now