Jump to content
Mander Organ Builders Forum

pwhodges

Members
  • Posts

    887
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by pwhodges

  1. 1 hour ago, Contrabombarde said:

    Dunno, looks to me like the bent metal is just a brace for the mitre.

    Agreed - but one of those pipes has a sharper bend at the mitre, and the support piece has a bulge visible as a result, so I suspect that one pipe is a bit out of sorts.

    Paul

  2. Reading Minster ("St Mary's, Butts" as we called it, to distinguish it from "St Mary's, Castle Street" about 200 yards away) is where I first played and practiced the organ.  Although ignorant of most things about organs at the time, I felt that it compared favourably with the similarly-sized organ in Christ Church, Oxford, which was the only other organ I knew well (not to play, though).  It was all working fine back in the 1960s...  The rebuild appeal has been going for ever, it seems to me.

    I have an privately published LP recording which includes one track on the All Saints, High Wycombe Willis.  It is Widor's Toccata, played by Alastair Ross, and it's the slowest performance I have ever come across - apparently because he couldn't reliably play it faster on the organ as it then was (in 1977).  I don't know why that organ was used, given that the rest of the LP was recorded in Reading Town Hall; perhaps the Willis there (not so very long before its restoration) was in a worse condition at the time.

    Paul

  3. 6 hours ago, Colin Pykett said:

    Why should I be expected to be an honorary proof reader for Wikipedia?

    Because that's how it's meant to work?  People who know the answers correct it - there's no magical authority which checks all the text continuously.  For that there are commercial offerings, but I wouldn't like to guarantee that they are uniformly better than Wikipedia.  I quite often correct articles in which I find mistakes, and have even contributed much of the main text of a few articles.

    Paul

  4. From a local guide (in English):

    "The church has the organ installed by the company „Driver&Co”, built in 1925 in Burnley (United Kingdom)"

    Another guide says:

    "Tourists will be interested to see the ancient organ and the choirs, made of dark wood."

    3525774619_003c1a90c3_c.jpg.905cf2bc81883826f07fab878202eaf9.jpg

    Paul

  5. An article about SS Wesley in the Musical Times of 1 Jul 1900 has a footnote which says that Wesley's views on temperament were set out in detail in three letters he wrote the Musical Standard in 1863 (issues of 1 Apr, 1 Jul, and 1 Dec).

    Sadly, a simple search on jstor for Musical Standard as a publication name netted me no hits.  The Dictionary of National Biography gives the quote  ‘The practice of tuning organs by equal temperament is, in my humble opinion, most erroneous’, attributing it to similar dates: (Musical Standard, 1 April 1863 p. 242, 15 June 1863 p. 321, 1 July 1863 p. 337).

    Paul

  6. 3 hours ago, Colin Pykett said:

    But it seems to me that the broadcasting and recording industry somehow got off on the wrong foot from the start by making recordings in rooms of a type never encountered previously.  Those early photos from a century ago of tiny BBC studios draped with heavy sound-deadening material say it all.

    Recording sound in mono or even stereo with normal reverberation confuses the listener by forcing all the ambience which is part of the natural sound into the same direction as the "target" sound.  Means to reduce the confusion this unnatural sound balance creates were an inevitable part of the development of recording techniques.  Remember also that listening rooms in the past were likely more reverberant than our modern carpeted rooms, and the reduction of the double ambience effect was also an issue.  But it may also be true that as the worst effects of this in mono were lessened by the move to stereo, and somewhat to a minimal form of surround, these techniques have not been stepped back from by a suitable readjustment of recording techniques.  But only full Ambisonic recording (or some equivalent) combined with full 3D reproduction can claim to render tweaking of the original recording unnecessary.

    Remember also that there are two fundamentally different approaches to recording: one attempts to reproduce the original as heard by a listener in the original venue, and the other attempts to capture the original sound with as little of the surrounding ambience as possible so that it can be replayed as if performed in the listener's own venue.  For the second, the idea of an orchestra playing in your sitting room is clearly absurd, but maybe a solo piano, not so much?  The possibility of the two methods is highlighted by Hauptwerk, where the availability of ambient recordings for listening pleasure is set alongside dry recordings to be used as the sound sources for an installation in a church or other suitable venue which will provide the acoustic.

    Paul

    Background: I was trained by the BBC primarily in mono recording, have made commercial CDs in stereo, also demonstration recordings in full Ambisonics, and use a dry sample set in a portable Hauptwerk organ I take around for continuo work.

  7. Engineers and critics alike have for many decades preferred "clarity" over "naturalness" or realism.  This is why I generally prefer my own recordings (some of which have been commercial) to those of others.

    I use a single-point surround microphone (key word: ambisonics).  Because realism in playback is limited if a full 3D playback system is not available (I don't have one, but do have horizontal surround in a symmetrical format - not cinema layout), I often make binaural files using my own HRTF to play back over headphones.  But in this case the best realism requires head tracking to keep the reproduced sound stable in position as the listener's head moves, and again I don't have adequate hardware for that.

    The trouble is that without full surround, the choice is between having recorded reverberation included from the same direction as the musicians (which muddles the image) or simply reducing it (which makes the acoustic unrealistic).  Adding reverberation in playback is no more realistic, but may be a useful compromise in some situations; again, it works best if not limited to a stereo pair of speakers in front.

    Paul

  8. On the other hand, being able to edit a quote means that a small selection from a large post can be isolated and responded to; something I encourage forum users to do to prevent walls of duplicated text building up.

    Paul

  9. For noise reduction, WaveLab is pretty good.  It's not expensive when put alongside programs like iZotope RX (a very powerful noise reduction package).

    The late CoolEdit (which I used to master a couple of commercial CDs before I got WaveLab) morphed into Adobe Audition.  It's a very capable package, but I no longer use it, as for years now it has (like all Adobe software) only been available on subscription.

    In this case, a 50Hz hum might be readily removable with no more than a very sharp notch filter.  But more likely, it will have harmonics as well.  In that case either the noise sample and subtract technique mentioned by Colin can be used; or, for instance, iZotope RX has a specialised hum filter which applies a very sharp notch filter to the hum frequency and also to as many harmonics as you specify, and has a mode which makes the filter adjust to follow the hum frequency if it varies (e.g. because of tape or record wow).

    Paul

  10. Canterbury - Forwoods - I was at school there in the early '60s, and my (school) house was only just round the corner, so I spent many hours (when I should have been practicing, perhaps!) reading The Gramophone and chatting to old Mr Reginald Forwood about records and hi-fi.  It was just the one family shop then, but now they've moved and run a rather effective mail-order business that I've used a couple of times.

    Reading - Barnes & Avis - In my childhood my piano was a "Barnes & Avis" upright; the music shop was founded about 1910, I think, and sold a lot of pianos, some branded with their name; I believe Avis had been a piano tuner, but I don't think Barnes had any link with the Barnes who built pianos in London in the earlier twentieth century.  I have little memory of the shop itself.

    Oxford - Blackwell's barely needs mentioning, of course; I bought many early hardback volumes of the Neue Bach Ausgabe, organ and more, from their nicely obscure secondhand department (a subscriber had died), and was once introduced by the staff to a harpsichord maker (Michael Thomas), to whom I subsequently presented a dead pear tree, which he favoured for jacks.  But from my school and student days I also remember Taphouse's (his son was at my prep school, but not in the cathedral choir), and Russell Acott's.  The latter would always stock up with music required for the Oxford Music Festival, and when one year there was an Alkan class (only my son entered) they stocked up with all of Alkan's piano music, just in case.  They had a huge music sale when they closed their shop in 1998; I bought some music still priced in £.s.d, and they honoured the prices on the old tickets!  After a short period as a hire piano setup, they've finally closed. 

    Paul

  11. Wikipedia (in the composer's entry) says that it's based on a foreign carol (maybe Italian).

    I understand (from Hyperion sleeve-notes) that Hogwood's 1983 edition gives the carol titles for all but one of the Noëls, so that might help confirm the above.

    (Later:) There is an article on Daquin's Noëls starting on page 22 of this PDF.  The author states that the Noël Étranger is the only one he has not been able to identify a source for.  He writes:

    Quote

    The eighth noël so far remains a puzzle.  My research is by no means finished, but so far this tune has not been found in other sources.  The only clue is the title given by Daquin: "Noël Étranger" - a strange, unknown, or foreign noël.  It could not have been familiar to the people of Paris and its surrounding regions; therefore, it would be from a distant part of France or another country entirely.  The rhythm and harmonic structure remind us of 16th-century Italian and Spanish dance forms.  Its character is certainly unlike the others in this collection.  Some French Canadians call it a "pastiche".  Perhaps Daquin wrote it himself!

    Paul

  12. Reading Minster (where I first sang as a chorister, and first learnt the organ) also has a significant (BIOS grade II*) 1862 Father Willis organ last rebuilt by Willis III in the 1930s which is struggling to remain usable.  They have an appeal open for £600,000, but (not currently living in Reading) I see little sign of progress.

    Paul

  13. When I was a chorister there, the choir stalls were at the crossing end of the nave, further from the organ than now (still not far, the nave being so short, of course!).  Evensong was sung there Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday, and Sunday; Wednesday was men-only, and Friday was unaccompanied at the East End (occasionally using the "Crotch" organ - no longer present - for continuo).  Sunday mornings had Mattins in the choir stalls, followed for my first couple of years by the Litany, after which we processed to the East End for the Eucharist, which was unaccompanied; the only exceptions were Christmas Day and Easter Day when we sang the Eucharist from the choir stalls, with organ.  No weekday Eucharists except 8am on red-letter saints' days, when the boys, alone, sang plainchant - most often, but not always, Missa de Angelis.

    Stories about what the choir got up to while having breakfast alone early, supervised by only the cook, don't really belong here...

    Paul

  14. I have no photo of the old console at Salisbury, but I found this quote in an article by Alcock in The Rotunda (March 1932, p29):

    Quote

    At Salisbury Cathedral some years ago one of the Choir pistons got out of order during a Sunday morning service, the jamming of the stops putting that manual out of action.  As soon as I was free I found that a centre of the fan operated by the piston had snapped.  I quickly dismantled the whole affair, and after a quick lunch turned up a new centre in my lathe and had all in working order before the afternoon service.

    How many organists these days have a lathe to hand, I wonder!

    Paul

  15. 9 hours ago, Rowland Wateridge said:

    I haven’t heard any criticism of Willis II.

    He did, however, make the very odd decision to move the choir case at Christ Church to the back of the organ so it faced the doors!  It got moved to the front again after barely a decade.

    Paul

  16. 6 hours ago, Martin Cooke said:

    Mmm... the Tuba certainly sounds a bit ropey unless that is just distortion on that discord.

    The tuba was fine when I was a chorister there (55-59), and unlike many was enclosed.

    The arpeggio figuration in the last section of Walton's The Twelve  was written to be played using it, and sounded very well that way (of course, Walton would have been familiar with it).  In the orchestral version performed a few days earlier than the Ch Ch premier, the figuration was given to a glockenspiel - a very different way of getting it to stand out!

    Paul

×
×
  • Create New...