Jump to content
Mander Organ Builders Forum

carrick

Members
  • Posts

    127
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by carrick

  1. 1 hour ago, Colin Pykett said:

    It just shows what puffery electronic organ manufacturers have always allowed themselves to indulge in, and still do.  Personally I think a better description is rowlocks.

    Hmmm, a Hammond in a big room can create quite a punch for what it is, it's still an impressive sound, though it might not be to everyone's taste, likewise for pipes too.

  2. 3 hours ago, John Robinson said:

    At the risk of displaying my ignorance, what's a regulator?  Can't you just turn off the tremulants?

    "Regulator" is a common word in theatre organ terminology for bellows. Yes, you can just turn off the tremulants (and the Tibias). 

  3. 3 hours ago, John Robinson said:

    'Wobulation'!  Brilliant!

    I have to say that I am no fan of theatre organs, at least when played like that.  To be honest, I can't say I have ever heard one played without such 'wobulators', but I'd imagine that they could emulate traditional church and concert hall pipe organs if the player wanted to do so.

    You need some rock solid regulators for that. Compton regulators behave themselves and can pull it off well, provided you don't use celestes or any tibias. Wurlitzers need a bit more care, as the regulators usually want bounce. I don't believe for one second that anyone can say they aren't a fan of theatre organs, it just takes for you to find the style of playing that you enjoy. That's the beauty of it!

  4. 6 hours ago, handsoff said:

    Thank you carrick - my ignorance of the Blackpool Wurlizter scene is shocking! Having never visited the town or known anything about the organs I had wrongly assumed that all 3 venues were part of the same.  I am fascinated by the theatre/cinema organ and enjoy the sound; especially when the tremulants are used a bit more sparingly than sometimes seems to be the case but I put that down to my, ummm, blinkered early years!

    Mrs H and & I have long said that we should like to see the Blackpool illuminations so in the coming Autumn we shall and try to time the visit with a concert.

    Both the Empress Ballroom and Opera House are in the Winter Gardens. Wobulation devices are there to be used, though, I will admit it takes a few minutes to get used to them after being used to hearing the straight sound.

    Concert wise, May might be the only other date at the Opera House this year, getting the dates for concerts can be tricky as it's a very busy venue. Hopefully, there will be more dates later in the year as the theatre and the organ are 80 years old this year. 

    Concerts in the Empress Ballroom aren't happening as yet, but that is on the cards for the future. Tower Ballroom concerts are like hens teeth now, the last one was 3 years ago for Phil Kelsalls 40th anniversary, this year marks 125 years of the Tower Building, and 90 years of Wurlitzer in the Tower Ballroom, so I reckon there might be a possibility of a concert there this year.

  5. 9 hours ago, handsoff said:

    I recall hearing or reading somewhere that the Blackpool Wurlizter has a significant amount of electronic amplification. Is this correct or an urban myth?

     

    Thanks

     

     

     

     

    There are three Wurlitzers in Blackpool.
    1:- Tower Ballroom :- Yes, it is amplified. The organ can be heard perfectly well on the ballroom floor without amplification, however, the spaces along the sides of the ballroom floor where the "audience" sit misses the sound, so it was amplified for their sakes. These days, with how current sound technicians operate, it is often cranked up to silly levels which aren't needed at all. All it needs is a "push" into the sides of the room. 

    2:- Empress Ballroom - This is a "hybrid" (as it isn't purely Wurlitzer, yet!). It was installed in 2014. The Empress Ballroom is a bit larger than St Georges Hall in Liverpool, almost twice the size of the Tower Ballroom. No amplification needed at all, it's pretty loud on the ballroom floor

    3:- Opera House - The last new Wurlitzer to come to the UK from the Wurlitzer factory. It's installed understage and speaks through the orchestra pit. Some of the sound of the organ misses the stalls seating a little. So, for concerts, mild "amplification" is applied to give the sound a little push into the stalls, you'd never notice it was amplified though,  as I make sure you can't each morning before the concert. 

  6. Adding to the variety... Blackpool Opera House's Mighty Wurlitzer, the last to be shipped to the UK by the Wurlitzer company, is 80 years young this year. The only Wurlitzer to be installed in a true theatre in the UK, it is still used for shows and events, as well as concerts. The next concert will be on the 14th of May at 2 pm (doors 1:30). With tickets just £6.50, it's a cheap and easy way to support an instrument that marks the end of an era. 

    Tickets can be booked online at -  Tickets

    Or you can book from the box office on the day, or by telephone :- 0844 856 1111

     

    Organists On Parade May 2014 copy (1).jpg

  7. No problem at all! 57 ranks at those prices work out between £570,000 to £860,000 from new.  Percussions, traps, effects are all available second hand, and you can always have a digitally sampled piano, there are some pretty impressive samples out there for things like Kontact software etc. The possibilities these days in organ building are almost limitless, with the exception of space and budget. 

  8. @MusingMuso For your benefit, here's a spec straight from the Civic Hall Compton console, working in sides reading from left to right. Row 1 is the bottom stop rail, Row 3 is the top stop rail. The Krummet was replaced by the Sax. 

    Left Stop Jamb
    Row 1 - Pedal
    32ft Harmonics of
    16ft Harmonics of
    16ft Bombarde
    16ft Posaune
    16ft Trumpet
    8ft Bombarde
    8ft English Horn
    4ft Bombarde
    16ft Piano
    Cymbal Tap
    Triangle
    Crash Cymbal
    Bass Drum P
    Bass Drum F
    Choir to Pedal
    Great to Pedal
    Swell to Pedal
    Solo to Pedal
    Solo Octave to Pedal

    Row 2 - Effects
    Fire Bell
    Surf
    Train Whistle
    Steam Boat
    Sleigh Bells
    Break - Pedal
    32ft Sub Bass
    16ft Contra Bass
    16ft Open Bass
    16ft Salicional
    16ft Violone
    16ft Sub Bass
    16ft Bourdon
    10 2/3 Quinte
    8ft Octave
    8ft Salicional
    8ft Flute
    5 1/3 Twelfth
    4ft Fifteenth
    4ft Flute
    IV Fourniture

    Row 3 - Swell
    16ft Violone
    8ft Geigen
    8ft Viola de Gamba
    8ft Viole Celeste
    8ft Rohr Flute
    4ft Geigen Octave
    4ft Viola
    2ft Fifteenth
    IV Mixture
    16ft Double Trumpet
    8ft Trumpet
    8ft Hautboy
    4ft Clarion
    Sub Octave
    Octave
    Tremulant
    Solo to Swell

    Back rail - Solo
    8ft Violone Cello
    8ft Viole Celeste
    8ft Harmonic Flute
    4ft Harmonic Flute
    8ft Clarinet
    8ft Orchestral Oboe
    8ft Kinura
    8ft Brass Sax
    8ft English Horn
    8ft Tuba
    8ft Trumpet
    4ft Tuba Clarion
    8ft Tibia Clausa
    4ft Tibia Clausa
    12th Tibia Clausa
    2ft Tibia Clausa
    4ft Glock
    4ft Xylo
    4ft Vibraphone
    Chimes
    8ft Grand Piano
    Unison Off
    Sub Octave
    Octave
    Tremulant
    Great to Solo Sub
    Great to Solo Unison
    Great to Solo Octave
    Great to Solo Quint
    Great to Solo Tierce

    Left Stop Jamb
    Row 1 - Choir
    2ft Tibia Clausa
    2ft Tibia 12th
    2ft Fifteenth
    1 3/5 Tierce
    II Acuta
    8ft Horn
    8ft Posaune
    8ft English Horn
    8ft Tuba
    8ft Brass Sax
    8ft Kinura
    4ft Vibraphone
    Triangle Tap
    Cymbal Tap
    Chinese Block
    Castanets
    Tambourine
    8ft Grand Piano
    4ft Grand Piano
    Octave
    Great to Choir
    Swell to Choir
    Solo to Choir
    Tremulant

    Row 2 - Great
    4ft Xylo
    Tremulant
    Sub Octave
    Octave
    Solo to Great
    Swell to Great
    Choir to Great
    16ft Grand Piano
    8ft Grand Piano
    4ft Grand Piano
    Break - Choir
    16ft Salicional
    16ft Bourdon
    8ft Violone Cello
    8ft Open Diapason
    8ft Gemshorn
    8ft Tibia Clausa
    8ft Salicional
    8ft Vox Angelica
    8ft Claribel Flute
    8ft Lieblich Gedeckt
    4ft Tibia Clausa
    4ft Salicet
    4ft Flauto Traverso
    4ft Lieblich Flote
    2 2/3 Nasard

    Row 3  - Great
    16ft Double Open Diapason
    8ft Violone Cello
    8ft Open Diapason I
    8ft Open Diapason II
    8ft Open Diapason III
    8ft Stopped Diapason
    8ft Tibia Clausa
    4ft Octave
    4ft Principal
    4ft Tibia Clausa
    2 2/3 Tibia Clausa
    2ft Super Octave
    12th
    2ft Fifteenth
    IV Fourniture
    IV Harmonics
    16ft Contra Posaune
    8ft Tromba
    8ft Horn
    8ft English Horn
    8ft Brass Sax
    8ft Kinura
    4ft Clarion
    4ft Glock




    As for prices for a new organ - I've always gone along the lines of others, budget for £10-15k per rank and you shouldn't too far off the mark. A new English Horn (theatre organ) will cost about £3500 for the pipework, plus the cost of the chest, winding, labour. 

  9. @MusingMuso Wolverhampton was 53 ranks as the instrument was, for the most part, pretty much a straight job. With the theatre additions, that took it up to 57 ranks. The 53 ranks alone make it the largest they built from scratch to have been installed in a civic building. Southampton comes in at 50 ranks.

     

  10. Now here's one I'm pretty sure you'll all enjoy. I had the privilege of watching Richard Hills at the 3/66 Kimball organ of Dickinson High School....via live stream! It's still there for folks to watch so, enjoy while it remains. 
     


     

  11. 3 hours ago, MusoMusing said:

    Utterly depressing....what happened to education and working-class pride?

    At £250 per pipe, I think I want to be an organ- pipe inspector.  At 6,000 pipes, that works out at £1.5 million, less the cost of a noddy suit and breathing apparatus.

    It's obviously more lucrative to destroy organs than it is to make them, play them or re-build them.

    Let us first learn the difference between the organ and the organ pipes.....there is no difference. As for the £250 per pipe.....the solution was simple to me. Test 1 pipe, if it has asbestos in it, then treat them all the same. Apparently, the blower intake was external too, so how the asbestos would have gotten into windlines etc is beyond me. 

  12.  
     
     
    6 hours ago, Rowland Wateridge said:

     

    Are people taking on board that it was never intended to re-install the organ in the Civic Hall?  Mr Tovey was looking for another location.

     

    Whilst it was never intended for the organ to be re-installed, the council's case for removing the organ was all rather shaky in the first place, before there was ever any mention of asbestos.  If you read the reports (written up by people who haven't the foggiest idea about pipe organs) on the WCC planning website, there are quite a few falsehoods about the instrument and its significance. They are basically using the refusal of Heritage Lottery Funding as the reason for removing it, going as far as to say because it was refused funding, it was not worthy of preserving.  As Mr Reynolds states in the meeting I linked to earlier, HLF are only interested in restoring visible pipe organs....

     

  13. https://www.expressandstar.com/news/local-hubs/wolverhampton/2019/02/23/asbestos-riddled-organ-posed-no-risk-to-public-health-council-claims/?fbclid=IwAR1jUU3KvMPGLNDRrlt1lbGLjf1VDFRr4l2GC79L8MiyFgJXIWG_b8nAaR0

    Now, if the "asbestos riddled" organ, which was only presumed to be contaminated, posed no risk to public health, why was it scrapped? Lets assume that the council are correct in their assumption that asbestos fibres were in the pipes whilst the organ was being used, then for all those years, surely it will have been throwing asbestos fibres out into the auditorium every time it has been played. 

  14. For those who didn't see the post made on a separate forum that Colin Pykett linked to, I will copy and paste it here for others to read. 

    "The organ was not a theatre organ, it was concert organ, the vast majority of it is a straight instrument, capable of being used for both classical and popular music. The organ was installed in 1938 when the hall was constructed. The organ included a melotone unit as part of the specification. This was rumoured to be down to John Compton's insistence that the organ had theatre ranks, however, the organist responsible for specifying the organ did not want theatre ranks/percussion on the organ. So a melotone was added. This was soon removed by Arnold Richardson very early in the history of the organ. 

    In the work done by Hawkins in 2001, a new transmission system was added to the organ, 4 theatre organ ranks and percussions were added to take place of the missing melotone. Three of the new ranks added were constructed new by Booths of Leeds, Brass Saxophone, English Horn and Kinura, as well as a Moller Tibia Clausa – which was of an enormous scale and sufficient to carry the other 56 ranks of the instrument when used in “theatrical” mode. It could be argued that these additions made the instrument more along the lines of what John Compton had intended in 1938. They certainly have been much appreciated by visiting organists as it allows for a much more flexible specification without destroying what was there originally.

    Let me make this clear – No changes were made to the original specification other than additions/borrowing. Nothing was removed and the original specification of the instrument was present (minus the long removed melotone). There was no new console, the console is original. The Ex Blackpool Empress Ballroom Wurlitzer console was purchased in 2004 to be connected to the organ as a secondary console. This never transpired. The Ex Empress Ballroom Wurlitzer console is now back in the Empress Ballroom. 

    In 2015 it was decided that the organ would be removed from the hall. According to the council, reports showed that in the event of a fire on the stage, the organ prevented effective smoke extraction and it would not be re-installed, but it would be placed into safe storage until funding and a home could be found for it. The hall closed in late 2015 – the organ was still in use up till this point. The council had been advised by Historic England that the organ be removed before any asbestos work was carried out in the building, and for its safety during the ongoing building works in the hall. The council did not carry this out despite offers of removal to storage at no cost to the council. They chose instead to leave the instrument in situ.

    In August 2018 after a long silence with regards to the future of the instrument, the council approved planning permission for the disposal of the instrument due to the assumption that the organ may possibly have been contaminated with asbestos. The pipework was apparently in poor condition and it would apparently cost £250 per pipe to test each pipe for asbestos and the council was not willing to go to this expense. 

    I'll add here that the pipework was in no worse condition than that of any pipe organ of 80 years of age, it was in pretty good condition, albeit a little dusty. 

    Information supplied to Historic England by the council/contractors made out that the organ was not unique, that it was a run of the mill cinema organ of which there are many examples of and that the original console had been replaced in 2004, when in actual fact it was still on the organ up till 2015. 

    It was also said that the audible and visible elements of the organ had been removed (if so how were organ concerts possible right up till the hall closed?) and because of that, it held no historic value.....

    It has also been stated that when approached, that the council were advised by Heritage Lottery Funding that the organ would be unsuccessful in any application for funding because HLF were only interested in more visible, less expensive organs, and not expensive enclosed instruments and because of this, it was deemed not worthy of preserving. Historic England gave the all clear for the instrument being disposed of. The reports quote £1.29 - 2.5 million for the restoration of the organ are completely off the mark, you could probably have built two or more organs of the same size for those figures. I have read elsewhere by organ builders that the lowest quote received was actually more in the region of £600k for restoration. By my own calculations, worked out at around £10k per rank, I'd have said that figure too.

    I would also add to this, to keep in mind that the scrapping of the organ was nothing to do with lack of money. Indeed, the council are spending £38.1 million (plus losses since the venue closed in 2015) on adding 400 new seats and a fly tower (with the organ now conveniently out of the way) in order to turn the venue into a theatre. That's around £100k per seat.....damn expensive seats!"

    I find it very sad that within a week or so of the organ's removal being announced, despite his poor health, after all his hard work to keep the organ playing and to keep it in use regularly, Steve Tovey died. It makes you wonder. 
    I don't believe for one minute that HLF was refused because the organ was enclosed with no visible pipe work. Though I could be wrong, but I wouldn't think it a reasonable argument for denying funding. 

    I have listed below a list of articles by the local newspaper, the Wolverhampton Express and Star, which has covered the story since 2015. 

    https://www.expressandstar.com/news/2015/04/10/historic-organ-at-wolverhamptons-civic-hall-in-line-for-1m-revamp/

    https://www.expressandstar.com/news/local-news/2016/09/28/wolverhamptons-resident-organist-steve-tovey-dies/

    https://www.expressandstar.com/news/2018/12/04/plans-to-restore-wolverhamptons-historic-organ-to-its-former-glory-scrapped/

     https://www.expressandstar.com/news/local-hubs/wolverhampton/2019/02/08/wolverhampton-council-dumps-priceless-organ-at-landfill-site/

    https://www.expressandstar.com/news/local-hubs/wolverhampton/2019/02/12/no-alternative-wolverhampton-council-defends-decision-to-scrap-historic-organ-pipes/


    https://www.expressandstar.com/news/local-hubs/wolverhampton/2019/02/14/revealed-wolverhampton-council-dumped-civic-hall-organ-pipes-without-carrying-out-full-asbestos-checks/

  15. ===================

     

     

    I just don't understand the obsession with Reginald Dixon, who was heavy handed the first time around, and totally predictable. His style is a complete turn off to most of the theatre organ crowd I know, and I don't know of many electronic exponents copying his style, unless they happen to be employed at Blackpool.

    .

    Your description is about as far as you can possibly get from Dixon. His style was crisp, clean, light, lively and spontanious. Your giving a snobs description of Dixon. As for Richard Hills, when I have spoken to him, he has respect for the style, and he does enjoy it when its done properly, and has been known to play in the style at concerts around the country. The whole idea of the Blackpool style is based around the sound of a dance band. That is how Dixon used to play.

     

    "Frankly, I doubt that anyone to-day would be turned on by replicating the style of "Mr.Blackpool" or any of his clones, whatever appeal it may have to a relatively tiny niche within the theatre organ world. "

    Thats also crap. The blackpool style gets the LARGEST AUDIENCES. Richard Hills etc are lucky if they get 100 in the door, yet book a blackpool organist, you get 300-500 in the door- It proves itself what people want to hear. Bums on seats PROVE it.

    I certainly cant see many "educated fleas" on here at all!!

  16. I can see what other people talk about on other forums now...this is the type of forum they mean. Its a disgrace of a forum. If this is the type of attitudes applied elsewhere in the organ world..........no wonder its a bloody mess!

  17. Possibly. There seems to be a cold front though surrounding Manderville, but a sudden surge of moderation would be welcome.

     

    P

     

    Ah, what have I said that people dont like? Im still on topic. It still all comes down to the organist being able to entertain.

  18. What tripe. Why does any film or TV or radio show that wants to place a scene in a church or a religious context put organ music in the background? Precisely because the public can recognise it, of course (though sadly they may be reinforcing an association with churches that is regrettable for the organs which are elsewhere). Some of the public might not be able to name the instrument - but tell the difference they most certainly can.

     

    Paul

    TRIPE. Most films/tv shows dont have a church or religious scene in them. Even the funerals/weddings etc now have a cd played on tv. #

    They STILL dont know the difference between an organ and a piano. To them they are the same thing. Keyboard is a piano, piano is a keyboard, organ is a piano, organ is a keyboard, keyboard is an organ. If it has keys, they are the same thing to the public.

  19. ==================

     

     

    There may have been a demand for Reg Dixon, but my own observations of the American resposne to the Blackppol style come from some of the membership of the American Theatre Organ Society, who more or less say that Phil Kelsall raises eyebrows, but not much else. It just idn't the American way of doing things, and I'm talking in the present tense rather than in the past one.

     

    As for the public not knowing what an organ sounds like, is that terribly important?

     

    Are you making a case for the organ never being brought to the attention of the publlic again?

     

    Personally, I think most members of the public know exactly what an organ sounds like, even if they choose not to listen to them.

     

    Virgil Fox did indeed work the crowd, but he was often grossly inaccurate and often re-invented things as he saw fit; thus inviting ridicule from serious musicians and music critics alike.

     

    Cameron Carpenter will, in all probability, remain in a minority of one. I doubt that there is anyone in the world who can do what he can do, or even want to do what he can do, and therein lies the problem. He is, nevertheless, quite phenomenal.

     

    As I've already pointed out, organists in other countries are often on TV and radio, and in the UK, the last extensive programming involved both Howard Goodall and John Scotti-Whiteley playing classical organs and music in their respective programmes "Howard Goodall's Organ works" and "21st century Bach."

     

    Frankly, I doubt that anyone to-day would be turned on by replicating the style of "Mr.Blackpool" or any of his clones, whatever appeal it may have to a relatively tiny niche within the theatre organ world.

     

    I simply do not understand the comment about classical organists playing music 300 years old. The same could be said of almost any instrumentalist or instrumental ensemble, and indeed choral groups. That is the market, and that is what is expected.

     

    MM

    I never said that the organ shouldnt be heard in public again. Jean was using a simple registration, for the purposes of TV and the Public. The public DONT know the difference between a piano and organ sounds, let alone know the difference between an organ and a piano, they think they are both the same thing.

    Well you said jean was playing music that was 30-50 years old and that it was out of date. In that case, then so is nearly 100% of organ repetoir, orchestral works, etc etc. Jean played what was expected of her. Should classical organist stop playing music that was written more than 30 years ago?! Should orchestras just do the same thing because its more than 30 years old?!

    As for the ATOS, many of the people I have spoken to in the US dont have much of an opinion of the ATOS. Much the same as many in the UK dont have a great opinion of the COS. And when the COS go to the ATOS conventions, very few will go near them!

    A majority of americans I have spoken to LOVE the Blackpool style, as does Richard Hills (that is where he started off). It has to be done properly, and there are only two or three organists who can pull it off as it should be. The current Blackpool style is best described as "contemporary" or "heavy" Blackpool, and its far from what it used to be except with it being in strict tempo.

    Robert Wolfe is popular in the US and in Australia. Hes about as close to 50s/60s Dixon as you can get now.

  20. =================

     

     

    To answer the first point, ther ever delightful Jean Martyn failed to deliver, but I suspect that she was badly advised.

     

    The only registration we heard was "piano," across all three performnces, and in the final, we heard her attempting to sing, but presumably this had not been communicated to the sound-engineers, who didn't provide a microphone.

     

    It was therefore disappointing on several fronts.......it didn't sound like an organ, it was poorl;y managed by the sound crew and, perhaps most importantly, the music was largely 30-50 years out of date. Even as pure "Rock," Jean is seriously outgunned by Cladia Herschfield in this particular category.

     

    Still, full marks to her for energy, liekability and presentation.

     

    Moving on to your assertion that no-one after Reg Dixon has done more to bring the organ to the public, I think it is important to think outside the box of local parish-boundary thinking.

     

    Klaus Wunderlich had world-wide sales which embraced Germany (as well as Holland/Austria etc), England and the USA, as well as all stations in between. His tours were absolute sell-outs, and I believe he managed to fill the Albert Hall on more than one occasion; such was his following. I don't think Reginald Dixon was very well known outside England, and the Americans just look baffled by his style, and fail to take it seriously. (The same is true of Phil Kelsall).

     

    Of course, classical organists could never attract big audiences or enjoy celebrity status.......could they?

     

    Virgil Fox is now just a memory, but there are a couple of other organists, (not Carlo Curley), who has something of a following, and they aren't American.

     

    The first is probably one of the most technically gifted organists in the worldm and possibly second only to Cameron Carpenter for out and out technique. I refer, of course, to Argentinian-born organist, Hector Olivera, who is quite an international celebrity; bringing classical, light-classical and light-music to the attention of his audiences in a quite extraordinary way, using anything from classical pipe-organ to electronics.

     

    The second is something of a TV presenter/personality in Hungary, even allowing for the fact that he was on the short list for the "50 most irritationg people in Hungary."

     

    Somewhat flamboyant, not a little outrageous, often controversial, but seldom dull, Xaver Varnus brings a combination of quite classy "cross-over" arrangements and classical organ works to his public:-

     

     

     

    Note the audience of 7,000 in the Budapest, Great Synagogue.

     

    MM

    The Americans wanted Dixon to go over to the states on tour, but he had his tour over here to do first, and by the time that was done, he was too ill. There was a HUGE demand for him over there.

    As for Jean on the show last night, I think they pushed her personality too much, rather than her playing skills. Personally I think they made a mockery of her. If she was given the chance and was let do what she wanted to do, she would have wiped the floor with the other pianist Paul.

    Also as for the "piano" registration, the public dont know what an organ should and shouldnt sound like. PLUS, the "organ" sounds wouldnt have came across as clearly on tv sets as the piano registrations did. She puts a smile on peoples faces, and she even managed to get Simon Cowell to like it. He is normally the first to critisise keyboard/piano/organ acts! Not one of the "judges" have ever said a bad word about her.

    Hector Olivera is an entertainer and showman as well. In abit more of a "niche" but he works the crowd. Thats what Virgil Fox done, he worked the crowd and entertained.

    Cameron Carpenters skill is fantastic, but hes far from being the way forward.

    I dont see Claudia on tv either. Infact, Jean is the only organist to actually go on the show so far.

    I could also say the same about classical/church organists playing music that is 300 years out of date. We dont see orchestras saying, oh, ditch all this stuff, it was composed 100 years ago.........the difference is, the music Jean played is well known. Music from Grease and "making your mind up" by Bucks Fizz (which was a Eurovision hit in 1981). A majority of what Jean was playing was known by the Public. The music she played last night spanned 3 decades, Nutrocker (1960s), Your The One That I Want (1978), Making Your Mind Up - 1981.

  21. Jean only got to 10th place in the final, but 10th place out of thousands of applicants for the show is very good going. She has brought the organ to the masses this week, and to a massive audience of around 10 million 3 times this week.....has any other organist done this before? Doubt it, not since Dixon has the organ world seen so much attention!

  22. presumably, MM this was not a typo :P

    Well, played properly they are pretty good instruments. Theres plenty of people use yamahas for portability and reliability and ease of use.

    Ive also read that Jean was forced to change her act at the last minute (it wasnt what they wanted for TV apparently) and only got 1 hour to practice her routine and what she was playing that night!

     

    This has surfaced on youtube though recently of Jean on piano

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbKdeGmvB9c

×
×
  • Create New...