Dear MM,
I'm afraid you are much mistaken.
Liszt merely transcribed the notes, as faithfully as he could for the new medium.
He left no performance indications whatsoever, and it is Grainger who gives the piece such contours and lyricism.
You can see this by looking at the score (always a mouse click away), or listening to the other performances of the Liszt arr. on youtube, such as these:
the Great British pianist Solomon: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtva4npTb5g
Svetla Protich: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmm1kC_fAaU...t=1&index=9
Swedish Roland Pöntinen:
What I find interesting, is that pianists, in the fugue at least, seem to relish the melodic shape of the subject, whereas organists just all seem to get off on the rhythm, resulting in lots of fast performances commented on by others. It was only listening to the piano performances that I realised how incredibly beautiful were Bach's inherent harmonic tensions within the fugue- something which the pianists (especially old Percy) really seem to bring out. Why is that? And why is it that organists seem to think that it is acceptable, as in the case of MM's "For once, i am speechless", Matteo Imbruno, to play elaborate counterpoint in what sounds like a 7-second echo? I have to say I am speechless too.
Incidentally, what do people think of Mr Dupre playing- in the 1940's, the A minor at St Mark's N. Audley St?:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_j3ifCBq34.
Contrarily,
C-VV