Jump to content
Mander Organ Builders Forum

gazman

Members
  • Posts

    1,045
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by gazman

  1. Hear, hear!

     

    It is pretty clear from the context that Tony was referring specifically to Christian faith. I suppose we must ourselves be charitable and allow that it may honestly not have occurred to some readers to construe his comment in that way. I hope this is the case.

     

    Let him who has never written (or uttered) a sentence that might be misconstrued cast the first stone.

    Yup, that's the way I read it too. :rolleyes:

  2. A quick Google shows that it appears quite easy to get Fellowships from the following, in exchange for a payment....

     

    [remainder of post deleted by moderator because inaccurate and in parts defamatory]

  3. Well I will voice my thoughts. There are a number of websites run by individuals common to the Crem website. All give away hoods based such flimsy requirements, such as the fact that one needs to have a pulse. These individuals who found such organisations are a menace, and devalue such diplomas that the likes of members of this board have worked long and hard for. About ten years ago to my eternal shame, I nearly joined one such society in desperation in order to get a hood (I didn't have one). My wife pursuaded me to work for them, and a few years down the line I now have a degree and five diplomas - and yes I worked hard for these, and am very proud to display my bling on appropriate occasions. I personally would like to ban the presentation of academic hoods to people in return for cold hard cash. At the end of the day, it's sheer hard work that counts. The fact that you have a nice 'ash grey' and red hood doesn't make you a good organist..........................

     

    In reading this through the steam coming out of my ears, I realise that the English language is quite appalling as I cannot deal with grammar when I'm seeing red.

    Isn't it interesting to note that all these places giving away dodgy 'diplomas' seem to have people at the helm who profess to have the degree of "DMus"?! As far as my understanding goes, whilst these 'organisations' are allowed to grant so-called diplomas, they're not allowed to give degrees. Where do these DMus degrees come from, then? I doubt they're genuine. The USA, perhaps? :blink:

  4. Thank you Squinius, and others who have helped by PM and by posting in this thread.

     

    Tuning was never really a problem as these ranks were at 32' and 16' pitch (and how often do organ tuners tune flue pipes at these pitches anyhow?!). However, if tuning did need attention, a knob was placed just inside the music desk to facilitate this.

  5. I'm intruiged by the 14 references, as I hadn't come across these before. Can you emlighten further? I had some post grad academic teaching (as well as him being my internal assesor) from a chap who wrote a book about, among other things, number structure in Clavierbung III. All that in the P and F; 3 flats, 3 distict ideas in the prelude, 3 fugue subjects, 3 to the power of 3 entries of the fugue subject in the fugue etc...

    I remember reading a fascinating article a long while back about the E flat Prelude and Fugue BWV 552. Not only did it discuss how often the number 3 appeared but, even more interestingly, how often the number 9 (the 'magic number') appeared. One of the properties which make 9 the 'magic number' is the fact that, if you have a larger number whose individual digits all add up to 9 when added together (say, for example, 144, 252), that number itself will be divisible by 9. I seem to recall that there are a large number of aspects of the fugue where the sum of the total can all be reduced to 9 - such as, for example, the total number of bars, the number of quavers, the number of B flats, E flats, A flats etc. I can't remember the details - nor where I read the article - but can remember being fascinated by it. Has anybody else come across it, and can they shed more light on it than my vague recollections?

  6. Thank you, Tony - and thank you too to those who have generously replied by PM thus far.

     

    Fortunately, the loudspeakers are very good, so will be retained. There isn't sufficient room for any large pipes and, as there's more than one electronic rank, a polyphone cube wouldn't be of much use. So, electronics will continue to be the way forward with this.

  7. Hi Folks!

     

    I'm after some recommendations along the lines of "These people know what they're doing" to "Don't touch the following people, even with a disinfected bargepole", please!

     

    I need to obtain some quotations for replacement of some electronic basses in a substantial pipe organ. The present electronic basses (a couple of 32s and 16s on the pedal, and the bottom octave of a 16' tenor C rank on a manual) were installed some 10 years ago, along with some terrific speakers, and were highly effective. Unfortunately, the electronics were plagued with gremlins from day one, and have now broken down almost completely. The church has taken the decision to retain the effective and substantial loudspeakers, but to replace the electronics and, perhaps, to enhance the system a little further. There is no further room for any additional pipes, so electronics will need to continue to be the way forward.

     

    So, I'm looking for a company who knows what they're doing with producing convincing electronic organ tones to blend in with existing pipes, and who would be used to getting the electronics to work with the existing transmission and capture systems. I'm a little out-of-touch about the very latest developments in electronic organs, and would like to know of some companies who could be recommended. Google comes up with a number who offer this sort of work and, whilst I'm sure a number of them are good, I suspect (from what I've heard in the past!) that a number of them are less good.

     

    In deference to our generous hosts (who, I believe, are not overly keen on having electronic instruments discussed on these forums), and due to the nature of this request, I'd be delighted to receive any advice about this by PM, if anybody felt so willing.

     

    Thank you. :)

  8. I found this a fascinating and surprising performance. Dark and sombre, evoking much more the price of heroism than its triumph; the few moments of optimism trampled by marching armies. I would love to know what was in Harold Darke's mind when he first worked on this piece.

    JC

    Agreed. I would love to know what was in Franck's mind when he composed it.

     

    Thank you maestro_vienna for uploading these. I, too, enjoyed listening to them very much.

  9. Holz, do you happen to know whether this one is still in situ and playable?

    I last played this one around 15 years ago, and actually thought it rather lovely at the time, despite a specification which looks rather austere on paper.

     

    Sorry, Vox, but I don't know any more about it, not having played it since. I'd love to find an excuse to reacquaint myself with it, though.

  10. To have to spend 40,000 GBP on a 23-year-old mechanical action organ is a damning indictment of the original instrument.

    Yes, indeed.

     

    It's interesting to note that, several years ago, I was asked to advise on a 22 year old practice instrument from the same stable. See http://www.npor.org.uk/cgi-bin/Rsearch.cgi...ec_index=N10444

     

    It was very, very worn indeed, and required a complete reconstruction. The authorities agreed but, unfortunately, chose an organ builder whom I would not have recommended to do the work due to his lack of specialism in mechanical actions, and subsequently also settled for a rather cheap "overhaul" as recommended by that builder instead of rather more extensive work which was obviously required. Unfortunately, this didn't improve matters, and I understand that the organ was again unplayable shortly after the overhaul. It is no longer at this venue, and nobody seems to be aware of what has become of it.

  11. I'm sure I must have come across several in my time. The Father Willis I first sat at (not in the south west) had Latin numerals, so I guess there must be others by him that are similar.

     

    There was an old Hill in Torquay (St Marychurch RC) that had Latin stop names as well, but they were sadly modernised long ago.

    Yes. The Father Willis organ at St. Mary's, Totnes, has the pitches given in Roman numerals.

     

    There were several organs in Torquay which had Latin stop names. They were all designed by W.S. Rockstro (http://www.bach-cantatas.com/Lib/Rockstro-William.htm) who was organist at All Saints' Church, Babbacombe, Torquay. They all followed the same pattern of being rather sketchy four-deckers, although all except the organ at St. Marychurch RC church have since been reduced to 3 manuals.

     

    I understand that the old Latin console of the organ at St. John's Church, Torquay (the last of these organs to retain the Latin stopknobs, which it did until 1957) is still stored in the basement of Torquay Museum.

  12. However 'nice' the incumbent may be, and however well they may get on personally, if the incumbent will not support him publicly 100%, he should get out.

    Which is exactly what my friend has done this evening, with some sadness, and for that reason.

     

    Thanks for all your advice, folks. :rolleyes:

  13. Is it reasonable for an organist to charge an extra fee to rehearse with a young instrumentalist who is expecting the organist to accompany him in several pieces he is playing at a wedding? The instrumentalist is unable to make any time before or after rehearsals and services at the church which have been offered and wants the organist to attend a separate rehearsal. The rehearsal will probably entail some coaching too. The instrumentalist is a young offspring of one of the choir who thinks that the organist is unreasonable to expect the bridal party to pay an additional fee, as does the Vicar.

     

    The fee paid to the organist for weddings is slightly below the RSCM recommended minimum too.

     

    Your opinion is sought again, please, folks! :P

     

    Thanks! :(

  14. I didn't see this, but have just flicked through on IPlayer. The Torquay church which was featured only briefly and towards the end of the programme is St. John's Church, Montpellier Place, Torquay. I don't recognise the building where the majority of the performances took place, though.

  15. I'm just wondering when we get to scale the houses of parliament and undo a banner!

     

    Enlightenment by PM.... ?

     

    Having listened to Prime Minister's Question Time this lunchtime, I note that the prime minister still refuses to give straight anwers, so "Enlightenment by PM" seems rather unlikely! ;):P

  16. Slightly off topic, but as someone with a brother (52) who is a CF sufferer, I was delighted to see that "A Boy Called Alex" was amongst the choral scholars in evidence at the 9 lessons & carols.

     

    The broadcast itself seems a bit of a farce. I found myself being impressed by the whole choir's ability to start unaccompanied carols without any given chord, but then frequently being reminded that the service is effectively fake by the pecularliarly changing lighting conditions in the chapel. How are you even supposed to believe its live when there is light streaming through the chapel windows at a time when, given the time of year, it should be pitch black outside?

    Are you supposed to believe that it's live? Says who?

  17. Oh dear! Here we go again. What seems to be misunderstood is that, at present, anything written on the Internet is, in law, published; our contributions to this and any one of thousands of Internet newsgroups, forums, etc are - in law - published. It is irrelevant that an Internet forum is 'public' or 'private'. Anything may be published, provided it does not break the laws concerning published material. It would be useful to bear this in mind, and not confuse it with the erosion of the right to free speech - which is 'free' as long as it isn't defamatory...

    Which just goes to prove that Mr. Bumble was correct in his conclusion that the law is, indeed, an ass.

  18. There could be some of the boards (within the forum) made private - for bona fide 'subscribers' only, leaving others are public read access. I run a few forums this way. Though I don't personally use Invision on mine (I usually use SMF, or phpBB, and one on Agora) I'm sure that Invision would allow this.

     

    That way, it would be up to posters whether to initiate a new topic on a private board (non-public-read) or in the public area, request/suggest that a moderator to move a topic to a private board (usually a one-click task), etc.. Normal members would be able to post/read in all boards, but guests would only be able to read public boards.

    I think this an excellent idea, and it's probably going to be the way forward if a number of us are to feel reasonably free to contribute to discussion at times.

  19. Thank you, everybody, for your replies. I have spoken to my friend who has read all the responses, and has found them very helpful and thought-provoking. He informs me that he has taken them on board and is very grateful for all your suggestions.

     

    Recalling what happened recently when a troll tried stirring up trouble in the Church Times, I have now deleted my original post.

     

    Thanks again! :P

     

    HG

×
×
  • Create New...