Jump to content
Mander Organ Builders Forum

Bevington

Members
  • Content Count

    87
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bevington

  1. Thank you, Tony - I'll follow up your suggestions and see how things work out .
  2. Thank you. Yes, it is Clifford Harker's arrangement, and there again I can find nothing to illuminate the issue of how one gets permission to use it. I am perplexed as to why Novello disown it (I have my late fathers 1937 edition - one of those ones with a pink/grey cover and St Cecilia window) when they must somewhere have some idea.
  3. I wonder if anyone is familiar with this work? I am trying to find out who owns the copyright, as it has just been recorded on an (unaltered) 1877 Willis organ for a forthcoming CD . Novello give the puzzling response that "it is not one of ours" (despite "Novello" clearly printed on the copy), but are unable to offer any further information. Any ideas appreciated.
  4. The title certainly appears when entered as a Google search - Sheet Music plus for example claims to sell it. It is also available in some libraries. I'm not sure how legal it is to scan and send a copy but that may be an answer. (My own copy is scrawled with markings - my teacher learned from Darke but I lay no claim to having inside info on how to register the music!)
  5. I have a PDF copy and happy to send, but not sure how to attach it to this reply.
  6. A fair question, Tony, which I can only answer on quite unacademic grounds! For many years I had the pleasure of being organist at a church with two organs - one a moderate sized romantic 3 manual; the other a fine little single manual 1845 Bevington. This splendid little instrument was sited so that its sound filled the building, often fooling people into thinking that the larger organ was being used. And yes, I happily played Tomkins, Gibbons, Locke, Purcell, Blow, Stanley, and so many others, on the Bevington - and as they were written, not in arrangements. But there is a warm, fuzzy, roma
  7. I wonder, please, if anyone is able to let me know where I may obtain a copy of the Coleman arrangement of Stanley's Voluntary in A minor, op 6 nr 2. Condition not important so long as it is legible! Some of the usual secondhand organ music sites don't appear to list it.
  8. David Patrick / Fitzjohn Music publishes Sonata nr 1 in G major - which is a fine sonata with a very attractive second movement. The others are out of print. Some years ago John Kitchen recorded the Sonata in Ab and if you were able to contact him (in Eddinburgh I recall) he may well be able to put you in the right direction. I have access to both so perhaps...
  9. This is not definitive and possibly not helpful: I have a facsimile copy of the original and the first two quavers are unmarked. However, somewhere I have a quite old recording (LP, not CD!) and the initial quavers are 'detached' rather than a real staccato. I played the Smart recently as a postlude and at a concert and find that I play those quavers - and subsequent repetitions of the pattern - with a mild detached touch aiming to focus an accent on the first beat of the ensuing bar(s). It may of course depend where you play - I have a large sluggish 3 manual instrument that needs to be told
  10. Now cverey please don’t take offence. Noting that you are listed as ‘newbie’ I’m puzzled as to your reason for joining the discussion board? There is very frank, intelligent, and well-considered exchange of ideas here from people who have a genuine concern for how the organ is perceived in the wider world and its real future - both sacred and secular. Unfortunately some opinions are incorrect. This doesn’t mean that you should not pose them to encourage interesting and stimulating discussion. No-one is ‘twisting’ your equally valid point of view, based on real experiences.
  11. Having moved house twice in 5 months I have not even found my Widor copies/CDs yet! But I wonder if one issue for the neglect of Widor movements is that the end doesn't justify the means - like Rheinberger, many Widor movement are more rewarding to hear rather than to learn and play. There are plenty of movements from Rheinberger sonatas that I enjoy separately, or as two contrasting movements, but I would only play a small handful of Rheinberger sonatas all through. Similarily I find some Widor symphonies / movements don't arouse enough interest to make it worth the time to learn. A little ti
  12. Thanks - it's good for those of us on the other side of the console to see what a high level of care and skill go towards producng the sounds we make.
  13. Good morning Sputnik: apologies for the delay in replying as I have had all manner of problems recently with email, and moving house into the bargain. I will reply again very soon with further information.
  14. Haven't played the Brewer for years, but having recently re-organised my organ music shelf it is easily to hand. I have spent much time with similar patterns in the first movement of Harwoods Sonata in C#. In my Brewer, however, I notice that last time I played it I obviously altered the fingering from years ago, as there is evidence of more youthful - and possibly more contrived fingering - being erased. I notice that I have marked my copy to allow a tiny 'lift' before some of the big chords that follow the six note groups of semiquavers. I guess that I did this to let me 'place' my hands
  15. I agree - I think the Emery editions are mostly sensible, certainly from a musical point of view - and yes, a health warning is often needed. (Although Kevin Bowyer once put out a CD of 'Edwardian Bach' which was rather fun, but would have sent the Baroque boys hissing into their sifflotes!). Listening again to the Koopman version of the F and F, I was struck by the intense rhythmic propulsion of his performance. Following it straight away with the performance by Karosi (mentioned by MM), I found the young Karosi's performance to be far less brilliant than when I first listened. In fact it se
  16. Interesting performance and all from memory. Returning to the very first question posed about editions - he is certainly not playing the notes as they appear in my urtext/Barenreiter edition! In fact, the notes sound just like those from the Novello version. So having come to terms with whether or not to play a major a minor chord . . . exactly how much of an urtext is supposed to be used?!! It seems that most of the youtube performances use very sensible versions of the music - inlcuding a correction to a couple of pedal notes mentioned earlier by Biggestalk.
  17. Perhaps this has been discussed before? I have recently "converted" from using my Novello version of Bach's Fantasia and Fugue in G minor, a piece I have not played for some time. Now I am using the Barenreiter edition, which for weary eyes certainly is a luxury with clear and uncluttered pages, amongst other advantages. There are of course some passages notated differently from the Novello - but the one I cannot absorb is the G major chord that ends the Fantasia. Novello has a minor chord. I am aware that there are those who believe in the idea of minor key works of this time ending on major
  18. I once had a tenor in a choir I ran years ago who had a succession of jobs, including one where he was the head porter (or something) at a Very Classy Hotel. He became 'night manager'. This meant that he wore morning dress (or whatever it is that they wear at Very Classy Hotels) and still had this encumbrance when he arrived for Sunday morning rehearsal. He became 'night manager' so for us the beginning of the day... but for him the end of the day. I soon discovered in the choir stalls the numerous empty mini bottles of port that he had 'acquired' at the end of each Saturday night. Many times
  19. I have it! Couperin, Bach, Hindemith and Reger put out by Gemini Recordings
  20. The Fanfare is included in 'The Organists' Manual' by Roger E Davis, and in this instance ends with the grace notes you mention, but it is printed separately as 'the original ending'. At the bottom of the page a note tells us "The ending enclosed in brackets is suggested by the author, the original by Lemmens was for pedals alone . Different endings for this piece may be found in other editions". In other words Davis adds his own ending in small notes (in brackets) at the end of the piece, and the grace note ending by Lemmens as an option!
  21. Edmund Crispin (the pen name of Bruce Montgomery) an organist/choirmaster at St Johns College, Oxford, in the first half of last century wrote some rather whimsical detective novels. One named "Holy Disorders" includes the vibrations of the 32' in an organ of a rural cathedral used to dislodge a slab (under which if I recall correctly) a dead body is found.... At one stage he was the regular crime writer for the Sunday Times. Organs get odd mention in some of the less known works of Dickens I recall. To this day I enjoy referring to my own place as the kinfreederal, after the urchin in one of
  22. I cannot actually help with the Evocation as I do not play it - but it seems to me that there are misprints lurking in a number of places in Dupre's music. I wonder if the best approach is to ignore obvious out-of-place clashes - such as the previously mentioned A flat against A natural - and go with what sits melodically, harmonically and logically. When I come across a questionable section I play over parts separately, or in single lines, to get the 'flow' of where it is going; and then usually find that what feels to be right is usually the best answer. A bit arbitrary perhaps . . . But of
  23. Hi MJF, As far as editions are concerned, my H W Gray is one of those reprints that looks fuzzy and occasionally blurred - like a school photocopier at 4.30pm Friday... I am intrigued by your ideas about the A flats. In some ways they make good sense, but there is a part of me that taps into a sort of modality that Dupre's music seems to exude . . . and therefore I wonder if things should be equal - i.e. the A flats in bar 15 agree with each other and at the end of bar 28 a restored A flat to again continue the modal feel . . . what do you think?
  24. If anyone plays this fugue, I wonder whether you may have some ideas about wayward accidentals - there are some obvious misprints but one or two others are borderline. I use the H W Gray 1983 reprint of their 1940 edition. The fugue begins on page 30. In bar 15, there are A naturals indicated on the first beat. On the third beat the implication is that the LH plays an A natural to clash with a pedal A flat - certainly doesn't sound logical. However it seems that both could be possible - either A naturals or A flats, the latter sounding a little more in keeping. At the bottom of the next page (
  25. Certainly the Church has to be a worshipping community (and it IS veering dangerously off topic, but where are the fora for this sort of discussion?). Meaning no disrespect to a previous post, I look back over a number of years and see again and again how many of my choir men AND their families have made choices to worship elsewhere when a new vicar dumbs down everything, all for the sake of relevance and needding a 'new kind of music'. Four of my previous parishes ‘lost’ their music and entire choirs . . . and years later want it all back, but with less use of the organ! Choirmen can be stron
×
×
  • Create New...