Jump to content
Mander Organ Builders Forum

John Robinson

Members
  • Posts

    1,060
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by John Robinson

  1. Thank you, Robert, and I'm grateful for your provision of additional information not available in the Harrison's statement.  It may be evident to some that I have had an almost inordinate interest in the York Minster organ for many years, at least since as a young lad in the 1960s when my school music teacher, Keith Rhodes, played us a recording of the very impressive Tuba Mirabilis.

    To quote you, "The H&H document also says, 'the layout will be conservatively revised, allowing the waisted lower part of the case once again to be visible.'  This involves moving the Solo swell box (which was between 1903 and 2018 hidden, along with the 1993 Bombarde, by the grey curtain to the north of the organ) into the lower part of the main case."

    This, which now clarified, sounds an excellent idea which was not apparent from what I had read before.  Not only would it permit a more direct sound from the Solo but also, presumably, would include the provision of louvres facing west and east.  I think the whole case would look more attractive too; taller and rather less 'square'.  I assume that the Bombarde would not be included, though.

    Your helpful explanation also answers my questions regarding the siting of the new 32' Ophicleide (and extensions) and the new Open Wood 16'.  It also clarifies the Harrison's statement that the 8' extension will be from the new Open Wood I rather than the existing Open Wood II, unless I have misread it, of course*.

    "The Trombas, on 15 inches wind, were more in the nature of Father Willis tubas in tone (evidenced from several recordings) and as such provided solo tuba effects on both sides of the screen."

    This too, explains a lot.  I was aware that the erstwhile Trombas on the Great were originally on a higher pressure (15"), but had no idea of their tone as I had never actually heard them!  If they can be voiced to sound like Father Willis tubas, I think that would be an excellent move.  Not that I have any dislike of other builders' tubas, but I have always particularly liked the Willis tubas at St Paul's which are atop the Great Organ and, I think, are also on 15" of wind pressure.

    As you have said you'd be happy to answer other questions, if I may, could I ask whether the (new?) Swell box will also benefit from both east- and west-facing louvres, thus providing a more direct sound?

    All things considered, these changes are encouraging and would seem to improve the general sound of the organ.  I intend, one day after the work is completed, to visit the Minster to see and hear the organ for myself.  Hopefully, there will also be some new recordings - video as well as sound - if not asking too much.  Perhaps Priory might be persuaded to create a new video recording of the revised organ, similar to the one I already possess!

    Once again, my sincere thanks for your very helpful and interesting explanations.

    (* Yes, I did!  Sorry.)

  2. For those interested, Harrison & Harrison have now published their intended specification for the organ at York Minster following their current alterations:

    http://www.harrisonorgans.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/York-Minster-Specification-Final-Version-AS.pdf

    They have stated that they would like to restore the organ to how it sounded after their earlier work in 1931, hoping to make the organ more powerful, yet more coherent in sound.  There is, of course, a situation at present where the organ is rather lacking in power when heard from the nave.  Personally, guessing from the specification supplied, I see both gains and losses.

    I find a comparison of the above scheme with reference to the present situation (provided in NPOR) to be very interesting.

    Taking each department individually, I see the GREAT organ is acquiring a new, more powerful Open Diapason 1 8' which I assume would be similar to that which was removed and installed in the PEDAL organ in 1960.  The instrument will now have four 8' diapasons.  The division will also have a new Harmonics mixture including both a tierce and a seventh, and an additional 4' trumpet.

    However, whilst clearly gaining power, the GREAT will be losing several 'colour' stops: 2' and 1 1/3' flutes, sesquialtera, cornet and cymbal which, I think, is a shame.  The consequence will be an overall reduction of two stops in that division, and I cannot see why at least a couple of the above lost voices couldn't be retained.  Space, I assume.

    Apart from a few name changes, the SWELL remains pretty much the same although pipes of the Violin Diapason and Diapason Celeste appear to have been rearranged yet their pipes, presumably, all retained.

    Similarly, the CHOIR is little changed apart from a small alteration to the composition of the Mixture.

    The SOLO. too, seems to have had very little change other than some names.  The Chimney Flute is replaced by a Harmonic Flute and a 2' Harmonic Piccolo added.  One thing that puzzles me, though, is the apparent removal of the very loud Bombarde 8', which provides a powerful east-facing reed comparable to the even louder Tuba Mirabilis 8' facing west.  Why?  If Harrisons' intention was to increase the overall power of the organ, why remove this stop and, presumably, leave just an empty space?

    The PEDAL organ sees some noticeable enhancement of power.  An additional Open Wood 16', presumably louder than the existing one, has appeared though I'm not sure exactly where it is going to be located.  There is also a new 8' extension of the existing 16' Open Wood.  Unfortunately, the 4' and 2' flutes seem to have disappeared, though.  The Mixture, too, will be rearranged to include a tierce.  Along with similar changes to GREAT mixtures, this suggests that Harrisons have a preference for tierce mixtures over the existing predominantly quint mixtures.  Personally, I feel that there is an advantage to having both for variety.

    The PEDAL reeds also appear to be bolstered by extending the existing 16' and 8' Ophicleide unit to both 32' and 4'.  This would certainly increase the power of the PEDAL organ, though I'm not sure whether or not it is intended to make the Ophicleides louder than the existing, already imposing, Sackbut/Trombone extension which, at present, is on a higher pressure (8 1/2") than the Ophicleides (6").  I welcome the additions, though that would also see the removal of the existing 4' Shawm.  I'd be interested to know where the new 32' Ophicleide extension might be located too.  To the north, to balance the Sackbut extension on the south?

    Overall, the organ will see a reduction of the total stop numbers from 84 to 82.

    Apologies for the lengthy post, but I'd be very interested to hear the views of other members of this forum, especially as these proposed changes raise as many questions as answers!

  3. 9 hours ago, Vox Humana said:

    I have this pinned to my tool bar, where it takes next to no room and is easy to access. I find it useful, although I have memorised the ASCII codes for the most common characters and find that method the quickest of all, if limited by what passes for my memory..

    Yes, I also use Character Map, although there are a large number of 'pages' to search through in order to find exactly what you want.

    I have changed settings in MS Word so that the button to the left of the number 1 button (I don't know what it's called!) can type ö by pressing it alone,  ü by using shift and the (unnamed) button, and ä by using Alt Gr along with the button.  Very useful and time-saving if you use the characters regularly.

    Of course, other alternative characters are just as easy to set up using word options/proofing/auto correct/replace text as you type.  I suppose you could set up as many characters you want in this way, providing that you have a suitable number of keys that you don't regularly use.  Yes it sounds a little complicated, but it isn't really!

  4. 11 hours ago, kropf said:

    Here is some good news, which may encourage this forum, too: As announced yesterdy, it became possible for the manager of the named second german forum to migrate it to SSL encryption and to update the software. This was made possible by a donation. May all organ fora prosper in 2019!

    Good news.

    I had a good look at that forum (orgel-information) and found it very interesting.  I have bookmarked it and intend to visit again.  It is fortunate for me, as my German is very basic indeed, that Google Translate works very well with that site and I find it really quite easy to understand.  I'd hesitate to post there, though, as if I tried to post in German (either by using Google Translate or stumbling along on my own!) I'd like as not be misunderstood.  For now, anyway, I shall just 'lurk'!

  5. 8 hours ago, kropf said:

    Hello everybody!

    After three years break, I am writing a contribution again.... I want to let you know that the provider of the second largest german-speaking forum (orgel-information) has announced to close down, as some work to be done regarding the need of https-encryption doesn't seem to him worth the effort anymore, as his forum has fallen into sort-of sleep, too. The dominant german forum (pfeifenorgelforum) is still busy, but also sees times of very little activity, and it is quite fascinating that one can't find any cause or pattern responsible for that. Facebook might be an issue, for shure.

    I promise to have o more frequent look to Mander's! As mentioned above, many hundreds of readers do benefit from the knowledge beeing shared here. For me as an organist from abroad who is addicted to anglican church music, it was and still is an important source. So, thanks go to all who kept this alive through the past years!

    Greetings from Karl-Bernhardin Kropf, DOM St. Mary's Church of Rostock, Germany

    I would certainly value more input from organ enthusiasts in Germany, and other countries, as my interest in organs extends beyond as well as within the UK.

  6. On 08/12/2018 at 20:33, quentinbellamy said:

    But I simply can't resist the DVDs because they provide much more that is of interest to me. 

    What organ would I like to see recorded?

    Yes, I know.  I'm being greedy.  But how about some foreign organs for a change?

    Sorry, Priory! 

    Edited:  I'm afraid I added my text to Quentinbellamy's quote!  Sorry.

  7. 7 hours ago, Vox Humana said:

    As for English grammar, both of my children say they were taught nothing about it at school and have learnt all they know about it from me - and goodness knows that's little enough.

    And people wonder why so many young people have little more than grunts and swear words these days, and don't get me on to the subject of written English!

    Sorry.  Off-topic.

  8. 12 hours ago, Tony Newnham said:

    As to the county, NPOR locations are based on counties as they were a good few years ago - and updating would be a mammoth job!.  Most if not all of London North of the Thames was in Middlesex at one time - areas South of the Thames appear under Kent - but since there's no need normally to specify a county in the search, it really makes little difference.

    Call me old fashioned, but I still think of counties as they were pre-1974.  The 'traditional' counties.

    I believe the 'new county' boundaries were only put in place for political reasons!

  9. 6 hours ago, handsoff said:

    One funny story from recent years. In our annual carol service not long ago there was a woman in the congregation with a very pronounced and uncontrolled vibrato coupled to a loud voice and apparently equally large ego. She was the sort that would finish a loud carol by say, going to the upper 5th and then the tonic an octave higher to finish. In "O Come all ye Faithful" I had prepared an alternative harmony for the final verse ("Sing Choirs of...." as it was before Christmas) but she took it it upon herself to belt out the Willcocks descant in competition.  Even with the limited organ, I won. Enough to say that she didn't hang about for the mince pies... 😈

    You should have modulated up a couple of notes and made her struggle!

  10. 13 hours ago, Martin Cooke said:

    Priory have announced the availability of their new Westminster Abbey DVD which Daniel Cook features in. Interesting that he has come back to do this, or perhaps he had started it before he left. Anyway, it looks like an excellent programme and it's firmly on my Christmas list. I have all the Priory DVDs and I wonder what others have made of them. I have found some of the organ tours a bit stilted - nobody better than Ian Tracey on the very first one and Simon Johnson at St Paul's - and some of the choices of music a bit weird. I do have an affinity to St Paul's but I think that, so far, at any rate, it is the best of all of them. By the way, you can see and hear a snippet from WA on the Priory website - Daniel Cook plays the Dignity and Impudence March.

    I, too, have all 14 of the prior(sorry!) Priory DVDs.  My trouble and strife keeps asking me what I want for Christmas, to which I can never think of any sensible reply (socks and handkerchieves now bursting out of my drawers) so this latest DVD has come as a godsend.

    As well as enjoying listening to the music, I have found these DVDs particularly interesting as a means of comparing several organs with regard to their tonal attributes and (as a non-organist) further enlightening myself as to the characteristics of different stops.  This latter point is most easily accomplished by listening to the 'introduction to the organ' sections, in which some individual stops are demonstrated.

  11. 9 hours ago, Peter Allison said:

    I raised this very question a while ago..."is anyone here?". I have made a few contributions over the years, but alas I am a "non playing enthusiast", and as such, can only really give so much. I look at this forum, every day, as I am now retired due to health issues, and do not get out much, so  I use the PC, as a means of communicating with the outside world, so to speak. And have made a few friends with people, both here, and a certain "social media" website called Face Book

    Me too.  As I am neither an organist nor an organ builder (though I wish - too late now), I'm afraid I cannot speak with any authority on organ matters.  I can, of course, ask questions and seek advice from more knowledgeable people on this forum.

    If it's of any help, I'll see what I can come up with!

  12. 10 hours ago, Colin Pykett said:

    There are doubtless several reasons why people aren't attracted to the forum, and I suggest one might be that it's an excessively clunky piece of software by today's standards I'm afraid.  As just one example, having typed the first few sentences of this post I then looked briefly at some other pages, only to find when I got back here that everything had vanished without trace and I had to start again from scratch.

    I have noticed such things on other web sites, so may I suggest a way around the problem?

    I often type out a reply, particularly if it is to be fairly extensive, in Word.  Then I am at liberty to jump about all over the place (with regard to exploring other web sites, etc.), and the genesis of my future post remains intact!

    It's just a simple matter of copying and pasting into the 'submit reply' box, or whatever.

  13. Our loss is their gain!

    Seriously, though, I'm glad to hear of British organs finding homes in other European countries.  After all, we have adopted sounds from Europe over many decades and it's nice to know that British sounds are finding favour over there too.  Tubas seem to be in favour these days too.

  14. 6 hours ago, John Pike Mander said:

    I have just been made aware of a very good booklet with wonderful photographs of the Christian Müller organ in the Bavokerk in Haarlem. The book was written by Anton Pauw and is in English. The book is available from H. de Vries Boeken for €9.95 plus €5.00 for postage at the web site below. I am enjoying my copy!

    John

    http://www.devriesboeken.nl/boeken/regionalia-algemeen/haarlem-diversen/nl/het-christian-müller-orgel-in-de-grote-of-st.-bavokerk-te-haarlem-anton-pauw-9789082895001/

    Thanks for that.  I was about to send for a copy when I noticed on the web page it says it is in Dutch.  Perhaps I have missed something, or is it possible to ask for a copy in English?

  15. 15 hours ago, S_L said:

    Perhaps it is time for those in charge of these instruments to 'get off their backsides', stop whinging about how hard it is and about how little the authorities care and do something about it! There is money to be had out there. It isn't always easy to find but, with imagination, and, sometimes, a little cheek, money can be forthcoming.

    Whilst I would support that, I'm afraid we as a country are lacking in the continuing fervent interest in the organ as found in such places as Germany and the Netherlands.  They seem to have new organs springing up all over the place!

    I don't know exactly why that should be, but that is the impression I get anyway.

  16. On 11/10/2018 at 13:14, Peter Allison said:

    its a sad fact of life, or so it seems, that most council (Lab/Con/Lib) run places, have no need for any organ, and the money needed to return it to a good condition, is deemed a "waste".

    Fortunately, not yet a universal attitude!  Leeds Town Hall, for example.

  17. 7 hours ago, David Drinkell said:

    Probably because a lot of these churches were suffragan (or deputies) in the large diocese of York - cathedrals in all but name.  This would apply to Ripon and Beverley, for example.  Also, the ancient Diocese of Lincoln was very large indeed (the Saxon Minster Minster at Stow-in-Lindsey may have been the cathedral before the See finally settled at Lincoln).  Therefore, there are a lot of big churches, some called minsters, in the east of England from the Wash to the Tyne.

    Another reason for big churches is that in the Middle Ages, the East of England was very rich, because of the money made from sheep farming.  This explains the huge "wool churches" of East Anglia and others further north.

    That makes a lot of sense, but it is also a fact that many churches have only recently taken on the appellation of 'minster'.

  18. Interestingly, it seems that an increasing number of churches are becoming 'minsters'!

    I don't suppose the new name implies any real practical difference to the building or the establishment, though I could be wrong.

  19. 7 hours ago, David Drinkell said:

    The crescendo pedal effect is an interesting point.  Over here, most organs have them and some organists seem to use them as a matter of course rather than registering by hand.  By extension of this practice,  I've noticed that the same players tend to draw more stops than I would think advisable (all the 8' flues, for example) rather than being selective.

    An interesting point, I agree.  Also, what interests me is the comparison of a pipe organ crescendo pedal with the crescendo pedal of an electronic organ.

    I know that the former (like a 'walze') brings on - or off - stops individually or perhaps in groups.  I know little of electronic organs, but is it not the case that a crescendo pedal on that sort of instrument would simply act like a volume control knob?  Of course, I realise I may be completely wrong, but I suspect that was the case with early electronics, like Hammonds for example.  If so, the sound variation would be not the same.

    Just another observation, if I may.  I haven't had time to listen to the comparison video as yet, but am sure I wouldn't be able to differentiate.  However, I think that would be an unfair test!  My laptop's speakers would be unable to reproduce every small nuance and, even with a top line computer and speakers, I suspect the same would be true.  After all, if we are listening to speakers, we are listening to an electronic reproduction anyway!

×
×
  • Create New...